Fujitsu’s £3.4bn Contracts Linked to Treasury: A Revelation of Supplier Accountability

Japanese technology giant Fujitsu has come under scrutiny after it was revealed that the company held contracts worth over £3.4bn linked to the UK Treasury since 2019. These figures, disclosed by the Commons’ treasury committee, shed light on the extent of Fujitsu’s involvement in the public sector and raise questions about supplier accountability.

The controversy surrounding Fujitsu stems from its flawed software, known as Horizon, which resulted in the wrongful prosecution of hundreds of subpostmasters. The high court ruling in December 2019 exposed the presence of “bugs, errors, and defects” in Fujitsu’s system, causing financial discrepancies in Post Office branch accounts.

The treasury committee’s findings indicate that £1.4bn of contracts were awarded to Treasury-affiliated organizations after the court ruling, while an additional £2bn of contracts were awarded prior to the judgment. Though some contracts have since concluded, the revelation that Fujitsu obtained such a significant amount of public funds raises concerns about the oversight and accountability of the procurement process.

Following the public outcry and ongoing public inquiry into the Post Office scandal, Fujitsu notified the Cabinet Office in January that it would refrain from bidding on UK public contracts until the conclusion of the investigation. This decision emphasizes the gravity of the situation and the need for a thorough examination of the events that led to one of the biggest miscarriages of justice in modern legal history.

Moreover, the treasury committee’s inquiry extends beyond Fujitsu’s relationship with the Post Office. It revealed that HM Revenue & Customs, the Financial Conduct Authority, and the Bank of England have all had contracts with Fujitsu Services or its global-owned entities. HMRC alone awarded Fujitsu contracts worth more than £2.8bn, with approximately £1.4bn of active contracts still in place.

The committee’s chair, Harriett Baldwin, expresses the importance of transparency and scrutiny in the role of Fujitsu as a public sector supplier. The revelation of these contracts underscores the need for comprehensive oversight and accountability measures when selecting and monitoring private companies tasked with critical systems and services.

As the government announces new laws to clear the names of wrongfully convicted post office operators and compensate them for their unjust prosecution, the scrutiny of both the Post Office and Fujitsu intensifies. The recent ITV series, “Mr Bates vs The Post Office,” has sparked national outrage, further amplifying the demands for justice.

This revelation of Fujitsu’s significant contracts with the UK Treasury serves as a wake-up call for enhanced supplier accountability in the public sector. The procurement process must ensure thorough evaluations of a supplier’s track record and reliability to avoid future failures that can have devastating consequences on innocent individuals and public trust.

FAQ based on the article:

1. What contracts has Fujitsu held with the UK Treasury?
– According to the article, Fujitsu has held contracts worth over £3.4bn linked to the UK Treasury since 2019.

2. What is the controversy surrounding Fujitsu?
– The controversy surrounding Fujitsu is related to its flawed software called Horizon, which resulted in the wrongful prosecution of hundreds of subpostmasters. The high court ruling in December 2019 revealed “bugs, errors, and defects” in Fujitsu’s system, causing financial discrepancies in Post Office branch accounts.

3. How much money was awarded to Treasury-affiliated organizations after the court ruling?
– After the court ruling, £1.4bn of contracts were awarded to Treasury-affiliated organizations.

4. How much money was awarded to Fujitsu before the court ruling?
– Before the court ruling, an additional £2bn of contracts were awarded to Fujitsu.

5. What decision did Fujitsu make in response to the public outcry and ongoing public inquiry?
– Fujitsu notified the Cabinet Office in January that it would refrain from bidding on UK public contracts until the conclusion of the investigation.

6. Which other organizations have had contracts with Fujitsu?
– The article mentions that HM Revenue & Customs, the Financial Conduct Authority, and the Bank of England have all had contracts with Fujitsu Services or its global-owned entities.

7. How much did HMRC alone award Fujitsu in contracts?
– HMRC awarded Fujitsu contracts worth more than £2.8bn, with approximately £1.4bn of active contracts still in place.

8. What is the importance of transparency and scrutiny in Fujitsu’s role as a public sector supplier?
– According to the committee’s chair, Harriett Baldwin, transparency and scrutiny are important in Fujitsu’s role as a public sector supplier, especially considering the significant contracts it has obtained with the UK Treasury. Comprehensive oversight and accountability measures are needed to ensure the selection and monitoring of private companies tasked with critical systems and services.

Definitions:

1. Subpostmasters: Individuals who manage and operate post office branches as sub-contractors of the Post Office.

2. Procurement: The process of obtaining goods or services, typically through a bidding or purchasing process.

3. Oversight: The act of monitoring or supervising something, in this case, the activities and performance of suppliers in the public sector.

4. Accountability: Being responsible for one’s actions and being answerable for the consequences of those actions.

5. Miscarriage of justice: A situation where a person is wrongly convicted or punished for a crime they did not commit.

6. Public trust: The confidence and reliance placed by the general public in the government and its institutions.

Suggested related links:
Fujitsu UK